The FINANCIAL -- For the first time, scientists have identified an 'ozone hole' over the
Arctic, in addition to the well-known ozone hole over the Antarctic. From Info CENN.
Unusually persistent low temperatures over the arctic in early 2011 caused an unprecedented amount of chemical destruction of stratospheric ozone there. The authors warn that this is likely to happen again, although it is presently difficult to predict when this might be.
Ozone depletion occurs naturally each year in the Arctic and the Antarctic when low temperatures in winter cause polar stratospheric clouds to form. These clouds help convert harmless forms of chlorine (chlorine nitrate and hydrogen chloride) into more reactive forms that destroy ozone. Normally, annual Arctic ozone loss is small compared to that in the Antarctic, but in early 2011, this study found that it was far greater than ever seen before in the Arctic, and the amount of ozone that was destroyed was comparable to that in some Antarctic ozone holes.
The scientists measured ozone loss over the Arctic using instruments attached to observation balloons and a satellite orbiting the Earth. Despite some uncertainty over precise levels of ozone depletion, the scientists estimate that 80% of Arctic ozone in the 18-20 km altitude range was lost between January and late March 2011. The chemical ozone loss was nearly double that in 1996, 2000, and 2005, the years with the next highest Arctic ozone depletion.
According to the study, which was partly supported by the EU RECONCILE project1, the unprecedented ozone loss in the Arctic was mainly caused by an unusually long period of low stratospheric temperatures (over the Arctic) that persisted from December through the end of March, much later than in other years. The low temperatures also extended over a larger altitude range than previously. Together, these factors led to a higher volume of PSCs forming over a longer time period, causing greater ozone loss than usual.
A long-term trend towards decreasing stratospheric temperatures in the Arctic means that an ozone hole is likely to appear again, say the scientists, but huge differences in winter conditions from year to year make it extremely difficult to predict when this might be. For example, the last decade has seen four of the warmest Arctic winters in the past 32 years and also two of the coldest. The variability in Arctic temperatures is also affected by increasing greenhouse gas emissions, which further complicates predictions.
Although the Arctic ozone hole in 2011 was confined to a smaller area than the Antarctic hole, there are concerns that if one occurs in the future, it may reach parts of the well-populated mid latitudes, as it did briefly in 2011, increasing the risk of mass exposure of people, plants and wildlife to harmful UV radiation from the sun.
In the 1980s, scientists linked the depletion of Antarctic ozone with rising levels of certain chemicals from human activity, most notably chlorofluorocarbons. Once they are in the atmosphere, CFCs persist for many decades, but a global reduction in CFC emissions under the Montreal Protocol2 has now stabilised the size of the Antarctic ozone hole.
Related Stories
